Germany the muslims will flock to the nazi’s-

-34gh.,b7

The Germans assumed that the Muslim world would naturally flock to the Nazi banner, since Muslims like Germans knew that Jews were the enemy, and since Germany was offering them freedom from France, Britain, and Russia. But for the most part, they were wrong. Muslims only embraced the Nazi cause in places where they were desperate to arm themselves against local persecutors, the Crimea, the Caucasus, and the Balkans. In most of the Muslim world, Hitler failed to attract a large following.

North Africa was a miserable failure for German recruitment. “230,000 Muslims fought for the Free French against the Axis from North Africa,” Motadel pointed out to me in our interview, far more than those who enlisted with Germany. The Germans had their millions of leaflets, but they were not the only propagandists in the field. “The Free French mobilized them with anti-colonial rhetoric. The British and French were the ruling powers; they had much more control over propaganda.”

The East was much more favorable than North Africa to the German recruitment drive. The Muslims of the Caucasus and the Crimea had many reasons to choose Germany over Stalin’s Soviet Union. “In the East the Muslim population had really suffered under Stalin, economically and religiously,” Motadel remarked to me. They had nothing to lose, they thought, by siding with “Adolf Effendi.” The Crimean Tatars took a notorious place among Germany’s most loyal and ruthless battalions, fighting both in the East and, near the end of the war, in Romania. The Tatars made the wrong choice: Stalin mercilessly deported many of them to his gulags after the war.

In the Balkans many Muslims turned to Germany in the middle of a brutal civil war, fleeing the rampages of the Croatian Ustase. The infamous all-Muslim Handžar battalion of the SS, organized in the Balkans late in the war, committed many atrocities. In Serbian areas, noted one British officer, the Handžar “massacres all civil population without mercy or regard for age or sex.”

The Nazis made sure, with few exceptions, that the Nuremberg laws could be applied only to Jews, not to those other Semites, the Arabs, nor to Turks and Persians—which paradoxically allowed certain communities of Jews in Muslim regions to also survive the Shoah. The Reich ruled that the Karaites, traditionally seen as a Turkic people, could be spared, while the Krymchaks should be murdered as Jews, though both these Crimean tribes followed Jewish law. The Karaites were close to the Muslim Crimean Tatars, and the Judeo-Tats also had deep ties to their Muslim neighbors. It was their supposed affinity to Islam that saved the lives of these observant Jews. In these cases the Nazi wish to cultivate the Muslim world even affected to a small degree their anti-Semitic policy—to the Jews’ advantage.

Hitler cultivated many parts of the Muslim world, but he was fanatically enthusiastic about only one country: Turkey (the Nazis officially decided in 1936 that the Turks were Aryans). Stefan Ihrig’s brilliant new book Atatürk in the Nazi Imagination demonstrates convincingly that Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s conquest of Turkey was the most important model for the Nazis’ remaking of Germany, far more so than Mussolini’s 1922 March on Rome, which is usually cited as Hitler’s main inspiration. Turkey had taken control of its destiny in manly fashion, in proud defiance of the international community—if only Germany would do the same! So argued many on the German right, including Hitler, during the 10 years between Atatürk’s victory and the Nazi seizure of power.

The victorious Entente had vastly curtailed Ottoman territory under the Treaty of Sèvres after WWI, just as the Treaty of Versailles shrank German territory. But the new nation of Turkey threw off the victors’ shackles and, after Mustafa Kemal (later renamed Atatürk) marched from Ankara westward, the Turks won the right to a homeland in the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. The Weimar Republic’s newspapers obsessively celebrated the Turks’ victory and endorsed their claims to the disputed region of Hatay (the Turks’ Alsace-Lorraine), portraying the Turks as more advanced than the Germans, trailblazers on the path to strong nationhood. “If we want to be free, then we will have no choice but to follow the Turkish example in one way or another,” the right-wing military man and journalist Hans Tröbst announced in the newspaper Heimatland in 1923. Nearly every item in Hitler’s playbook can be found in such Weimar-era endorsements of Atatürk: All Turkey had mobilized for the war; strong faith in their leader had saved them.

The Turks had achieved “the purification of a nation of its foreign elements on a grand scale.” He added that “Almost all of those of foreign background in the area of combat had to die; their number is not put too low with 500,000.” Here was a chilling endorsement of genocide, and one that surely did not escape Hitler’s eye. Shortly after his articles appeared, Hitler invited Tröbst to give a speech on Turkey to the SA.

From 1923 on, Hitler consistently praised Atatürk in his own speeches as well. Berlin, like Istanbul, was cosmopolitan and decadent. Munich, site of Hitler’s beer-hall putsch, was the place for a German “Ankara government.” When Hitler seized power in 1933 his Völkischer Beobachter cited Atatürk’s victory as the “star in the darkness” that had shone for the beleaguered Nazis in 1923, after the putsch’s failure. Turkey was “proof of what a real man could do”—a man like Atatürk, or Hitler.

The Third Reich produced many idolizing biographies of Atatürk. Six years after the Turkish leader’s death, in late 1944, a delusional Hitler was still dreaming of a postwar alliance between Turkey and Germany. He never got his wish. During the war, Turkey, as a neutral power, kept its distance from the Nazis until it finally declared war against Germany in February 1945.

. But while Atatürk disdained Hitler’s anti-Semitism, Erdogan is obsessed with Jews. The 2014 Gaza operation, he has remarked, was worse than anything Hitler ever did, and the Israelis have been committing “systematic genocide every day” since 1948. Perhaps if Erdogan had been in power in the 1940s, the Nazis would have found the Muslim ally they so desperately sought.

Weaponizing Islam has often been a temptation for the United States, just as it was for Germany. In its battle against Moscow, Washington recruited Islamic leaders after WWII, most famously Said Ramadan, a major figure in the Muslim Brotherhood. The United States even smiled on Saudi Arabia’s funding of radical Islamist organizations, hoping that religion would serve as a bulwark against Soviet Communism. Then the Muslim Brotherhood killed U.S. ally Anwar Sadat, and its follower Ayman al-Zawahiri became, along with Osama Bin Laden, the founder of al-Qaida. We supported the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan, until the Mujahedeen turned into the Taliban.

We still have not learned the major lesson of 20th-century history so adeptly conveyed by Motadel and Ihrig: Western leaders who try to get Islam on their side through propaganda and favors will be unpleasantly surprised.

Bosnian Muslim recruits for the Nazi SS shown pampere by the Hitlerites.

The Bolsheviks of Lenin clustered around their god.

source-mustafa kemal ataturk, hans trobst, tayip erdogan, said ramadan, alexander shah

 

 

Advertisements

The nazi romance with islam has some lessons for the united states–

-34gh.,b7

Both Hitler and Himmler had a soft spot for Islam. Hitler several times fantasized that, if the Saracens had not been stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread through the European continent—and that would have been a good thing, since “Jewish Christianity” wouldn’t have gone on to poison Europe. Christianity doted on weakness and suffering, while Islam extolled strength, Hitler believed. Himmler in a January 1944 speech called Islam “a practical and attractive religion for soldiers,” with its promise of paradise and beautiful women for brave martyrs after their death. “This is the kind of language a soldier understands,” Himmler gushed.

Surely, the Nazi leaders thought, Muslims would see that the Germans were their blood brothers: loyal, iron-willed, and most important, convinced that Jews were the evil that most plagued the world. “Do you recognize him, the fat, curly-haired Jew who deceives and rules the whole world and who steals the land of the Arabs?” demanded one of the Nazi pamphlets dropped over North Africa (a million copies of it were printed). “The Jew,” the pamphlet explained, was the evil King Dajjal from Islamic tradition, who in the world’s final days was supposed to lead 70,000 Jews from Isfahan in apocalyptic battle against Isa—often identified with Jesus, but according to the Reich Propaganda Ministry none other than Hitler himself. Germany produced reams of leaflets like this one, often quoting the Quran on the subject of Jewish treachery.

It is not surprising, then, that there are those today who draw a direct line between modern Jew-hatred in the Islamic world and the Nazis. A poster currently at Columbus Circle’s subway entrance proclaims loudly that “Jew-hatred is in the Quran.” The poster features a photograph of Hitler with the notoriously anti-Jewish Mufti al-Husaini of Palestine, who is erroneously labeled “the leader of the Muslim world.” The truth is considerably more complex. The mufti made himself useful to the Nazis as a propagandist, but he had little influence in most Muslim regions. Few Muslims believed Nazi claims that Hitler was the protector of Islam, much less the Twelfth Imam, as one Reich pamphlet suggested.

The Nazis’ anti-Jewish propaganda no doubt attracted many Muslims, as historian Jeffrey Herf has documented, but they balked at believing that Hitler would be their savior or liberator. Instead, they sensed correctly that the Nazis wanted Muslims to fight and die for Germany. As Rommel approached Cairo, Egyptians started to get nervous. They knew that the Germans were not coming to liberate them, but instead wanted to make the Muslim world part of their own burgeoning empire. In the end, more Muslims wound up fighting for the Allies than for the Axis.

Hitler’s failed effort to put Muslim boots on the ground still stands as the most far-reaching Western attempt to use Islam to win a war. Such is the judgment of David Motadel, the author of a new, authoritative book, Islam and Nazi Germany’s War.Motadel’s detailed and fascinating explanation of how and why the Nazis failed to get Muslims on their side is a must-read for serious students of World War II, and it has an important message as well for our own policy in the Middle East.

To grasp why the Nazis had such high hopes for Muslim collaboration—and why their hopes failed—we need to go back to the great war that made Hitler the fanatical monster he was. The kaiser’s army was exhausted, and its commanders suddenly realized that the quick Western Front victory they had dreamed of was impossible. Meanwhile, Russia was massing troops around Warsaw, and the tsar had just declared war on the Ottoman Empire.

There was one bright spot, though. On Nov. 11, 1914, the highest religious authority of the Ottoman caliphate, Sheikh al-Islam Ürgüplü Hayri, issued a call for worldwide jihad against Russia, Britain, and France. Suddenly, the Great War was a holy war. Surely, the Germans dreamed, Muslims would join their side en masse and turn the tide of battle.

In the early years of World War I the German Reich caught Islam fever: Muslims became the great Eastern hope against the Entente. Helmuth von Moltke, chief of the German general staff, planned to “awaken the fanaticism of Islam” in the French and British colonies, making the Muslim masses rise up against their European masters. Max von Oppenheim, the German diplomat and orientalist, described Islam as “one of our most important weapons” in his famous position paper of October 1914. Oppenheim wanted to spark a Muslim revolt stretching from India to Morocco that Germany could use for its own purposes. Germany just needed to get the message across, Oppenheim insisted: Russia, Britain, and France were the oppressors of Muslims, whereas the Germans would liberate them.

The German strategy didn’t work. Instead, Britain and France won the game when they capitalized on the Arab uprising against a crumbling Ottoman Empire. T.E. Lawrence, rather than the kaiser, inspired the Arabs. After the war, Britain and France sliced up the Middle East pie between them in the Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916.

Germany tried once again to mobilize Islam in WWII. Astonishingly, in 1940 Oppenheim, at that point 80 years old, championed the same plan that had failed so badly in the previous war. Even more surprising, Hitler and Himmler warmly embraced the part-Jewish Oppenheim’s idea: They too thought that Islam would help bring about a Nazi triumph.

“German officials would always refer to global Islam, to pan Islam,” Motadel told me over the phone from his home in Cambridge, England, where he is Research Fellow in History at the University of Cambridge’s Gonville and Caius College. The Nazis spoke of the Muslims as a “bloc” that could be “activated” against the British, the French, and the Soviets. Their belief that Islam was monolithic led them to ignore differences of region, sect, and nationality, which helped to ensure the failure of their efforts.

Germans sought out imams who would issue fatwas for their side, and they told their soldiers to be especially careful of religious sensibilities when traveling through Muslim territory. German forces in the East permitted Muslims to practice both circumcision and ritual slaughter, proving more liberal on these two issues than many Europeans are today. . But Berlin soon corrected the error and cautioned troops in the East to make sure to treat Muslims with respect, since they were Germany’s potential allies.

source–jeffrey herf, david motadel, sheik al-islam urguplu hayri, cnn, helmuth von moltke, gonville and caius college, alexander shah.

 

How Lenin used the workers and mobs to his benefit:

–34gh.,b7

Lenin used the discontent among the factory workers and the underpaid mobs of the big cities as the glue holding the supporters for his internationalist egalitarian promises of a better future for the supposedly downtrodden; Hitler used the deep discontent among the defeated Germans as his thick political glue with which to hold together an immature and impossible promise of a better future for a lonely Germany standing oblivious to the nations all around her. Germany was not an island. Germany’s life depended upon good relations with neighbors, much more than England’s national life did. And Russia was not even a nation but a vast Asian empire of poor Christian peasants and subdued Muslim tribes. Lenin sought to use nationalism as a disposable communist weapon and so he created Soviet republics for various minorities to feel elevated to the status of Western nations.

Hitler used it, too, in the same manner, issuing promises of national interest consideration to smaller nations only to trample them later. Like the LEFT today, neither Lenin nor Hitler respected the heritage or history or culture of any nation, not even their own. Nations to them are just means to an end, necessary for the acquisition of political power, to be used and then discarded like condoms. Whereas, nations used to be venerable phenomena. Although Hitler swore by mystic notions of Aryan unity – to him there was nothing venerable about the past, or even the German past, in order satisfy the envy in him. Envy seeks leveling, egalitarianism in its lowest state. Men he could not understand he automatically hated. Islam does the same thing. He made national existence a captive of brutalities of nature outside the higher history of Man of the past 5,000 years. Islam does the same thing. And the LEFT maintains this attitude to this day. The vulgarity of their viewpoints is matched by their appetite for control.

The modern LEFT is a hybrid of these three movements (Communism, Nazism and Islam). Lenin supplied the economic justification for the ever dumber masses subject to state propaganda to be nurtured at the public expense; although Hitler through his military acted as the main battering ram for the destruction of the conservative heritage of the European nations. ZThe national-socialist form of the German nation served to annihilate the intelligentsia and the traditional forces inside Germany, Europe’s most powerful nation. Hitler sought to reduce every German down to his own low personality standard, and whoever could not be thus transformed was killed or arrested. The LEFT today seeks everyone to be reduced down to the level of consumer. In fact, in Russia, Islam was aided by the ruling Communist authority erected on the grave of RussianChristianity after Lenin’s ascent to power. Numerous Soviet laws were passed to ensure the political activism of Muslim subjects of the old Russian Empire, and while the churches were being blown up by Lenin’s henchmen across Russia, the mosques were rising in the Soviet Union.

Vietnam became a bastion of communist guerrillas seeking to destroy the Western influence in that part of Asia. Long before the Vietnam War, Lenin’s agents were in French Indochina plotting attacks on Western interests. His ideas were so effective he even converted America’s news anchor Walther Cronkite to the cause.

Moscow turned the world into a vast worldwide series of communist election campaigns using bullets instead of ballots as the means of democratic franchise. For its part, (Nazi) Germany (which was allied with Lenin’s Russia for a time) openly attacked the colonial Western powers under the moral pretext of a colonial system’s injustice to Arabs and Africans – thereby seeking to bribe Islam to join the fight on behalf of Nazi Germany. The entire series of revolts against England and France in the Middle East and North Africa following World War II was a direct consequence of the work of Hitler. The annihilation of the Jews by Hitler inspired the Palestinians and other Arabs to think they could make a short work of the Jews in Israel in the Final Solution’s epilogue done the Islam’s way. Hitler revealed the rot in the heart of the White Man’s world and the Third World picked up on that. Islam to this day bases its morality of resistance to the West on the basis of the opening provided by Lenin’s ideology of exploitation and Hitler’s solution of genocide. The West exploits, the West kills, the West lacks authority: so Islam becomes the way.

So, this triumvirate of the 20th century is the sworn enemy of accumulated experience, full of hatred for history and carries resentment against the natural inequality of men’s talents and circumstances with which a wealth of diverse results are produced in a healthy culture. Above all, the LEFT recognizes, just as Hitler and Lenin did, that the institution of the traditional heterosexual family is the bedrock of history and, as such, it is to be eroded and destroyed. What cannot be controlled must be annihilated! This was the governing principle of Lenin, of Hitler and of Islam’s ideologues.

“If Allah were to take mankind to task for their wrongdoing, He would not leave a single living creature on the face of earth, but He reprieves them to an appointed time, and when their appointed time comes, they cannot put it off an hour nor can they advance it.” (Surah an-Nahl, 16:61).

“The state is only the vessel and the race is what it contains.  The vessel can only have meaning if it preserves and safeguards the contents  … The supreme purpose of the ethical state is to guard and preserve those racial elements” – A. Hitler, Mein Kampf

Hitler is wrong. The state is not only the vessel – the state is an idea itself that took a long time to emergeand, as such, it is venerable just as history that it emerged from, is, too!

source–koran, cnn, alexander shah.

Alliance Between the Left and Islam Cemented by Lenin and Hitler

–34gh.,b7

“Palestinian”: Jihad against Jews

Dateline, Europe, 2017: There is no respect for history anymore. There can be no positive excuse for attacks on the heritage of one’s nation. Such symbols and memories stand above the political opinion. They inspire individuals independently of government influence. What cannot be controlled must be annihilated! The monuments in America are intellectual obstacles to egalitarian government ideologues – but to men of an organic culture that transplanted itself from Europe onto the soil of the New World these standing objects capture the biographical character of men that enriched the American history. Obsession with slavery is largely a cult of vanity promoted by the LEFT to abolish the American identity and establish George Soros’ open society vision. European immigrants to America were diverse people of various grades of talent. Their combined contribution laid the foundation for the world’s most powerful nation.

When the symbols of the past become subjected to an opinion about their worth, then the heritage of the nation is not respected anymore. Heritage is not a matter of opinion. Heritage is a matter of fact, and as such, it is a living past coded into the memory of the people for whom it meant something. The sense of meaning derived from an artifact of history is a personal experience that is relived in every generation. Today, the monuments to American history are either falling or under attack everywhere, at the moment, this onslaught by the mobs is made easy by the liberal education system in America and Western Europe where all nations are treated with disrespect because of the need to erase the memory of a conservative, family-oriented and God-fearing past through which alone the Western nations emerged into existence after long centuries of development and sacrifice. Otherwise, the mob-like entourage of the LEFT standing behind our system of public education would not be in business for their sordid industry of human rights selectively applied. They need something to attack. The propaganda of the LEFT thrives on sonorous moral tales of past injustices to construct taboos with (taboos are fear-induced notions that cannot be questioned set up to limit public discourse, eliminate individual freedom of thought and control the only thing remaining – which is the group-based thought rooted in a consensus tirelessly restated every day in the mainstream media and in classrooms).

The LEFT today is the result of the alliances and conflicts between the three big players of the 20th century: Lenin, Hitler, and Islam. The manner in which the LEFT manufactures and enforces its canon through newspapers, TV screens and textbooks closely resembles the written method of Islam in the way in which it carries forth its mental control over its Muslim followers. The chief reason for the need for immigrants and outsiders in the West is that these imported types are ready material for brainwashing because they have no attachment to and no affinity for the heritage or traditions of the Western nations in which they find themselves – and can, therefore, be turned into ready pawns of the ideological system in control of the Western institutions, acting just like mercenaries in wars. Unlike the natives, these outsiders possess no inner energies of spiritual resistance against an attack on traditions of Western nations. What’s more, they join in on the attack with gusto! Every organism only can have what it can digest. Western nations are no longer living organisms that choose the food they digest.

. Ultimately, the key factor for the founders of the modern LEFT, just as it was for Lenin, for Hitler, and for Islam, has been the subculture of intellectual poverty widely represented in the American, Russian and German majorities that supported them politically. All they did was liberate the beast in man so it can become a weapon in their hands. The LEFT today treats the minorities in the same way, exploiting their intellectual poverty in order to use them as fists in a civil war against the patriotic forces that revere the nation’s past.

So this system of the LEFT is inherently opposed to World History and prefers to employ the vetted subject of history merely as a foil for its stupid moral lessons about the virtues of its system of government. This system of government of the LEFT is serving the purpose of an unnatural egalitarian logic (the logic that opposes everyone’s historical heritage because heritage is a matter of natural inequality and of invisible qualities that empower people independently of the government). The hybrid LEFT of today was conceived in the acerbic minds of disaffected intellectuals of the fringe of Western societies in the 19th century (thinkers like Karl Marx) to be used as a future social and intellectual weapon against the natural order formed by the flow of various grades of achievement in the human history of a nation. The chief method of this weapon was the divisive art of painting of social contrasts. But before this weapon could be deployed, a major geopolitical earthquake (like World War I) needed to be unleashed – just like noxious gases in a volcano cannot get out unless the build up of magma or lava leads to an explosion on the surface letting them loose upon the unsuspecting world.

Once the evil genie of the old LEFT got out of the bottle during World War One, this weapon wasted no time in being seized by demagogues and dictators of the LEFT, power-greedy men like Vladimir Lenin of Russia (internationalist) and Adolf Hitler of Germany (nationalist) looking to expand their sway over souls and fulfill their petty thirst for revenge against the society that rejected them – the polite society of circles of natural elites bound together by the substantial spirit of the intelligentsia thanks to which brilliant works of literature, arts, science, and engineering were made possible – human marvels of thought to which also the criticism of every government was natural! And so, these intellectually dishonest and largely talentless dictators of the 20th century became social rejects in one way or another. They were discontented and so they looked for discontent, just as the LEFT today does. Every cancer seeks out injured tissue first.

source–alexander shah,

Hamas-linked CAIR defends McMaster, says “islamophobes” behind effort to remove him

–34gh.,b7

General McMaster is undermining President Trump’s policies and is endangering national security with his support for The Muslim Brotherhood and The Council on American Islamic Relations.

CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

The Council on American Islamic Relations is backing President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Lieutenant General Herbert Raymond “H.R.” McMaster, claiming over social media that “Islamophobes” and “white supremacists” were behind attacks to remove him from the White House.

In a tweet sent this week, CAIR wrote, “Islamophobia Watch: Islamophobes, white supremacists launch campaign to oust H.R. McMaster after he fired…” and linked to a Newsweek article titled, “Why Is the Alt-Right Attacking H.R. McMaster?”

CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial and Hamas financing case that resulted in the FBI discontinuing its working relationship with the organization. In 2009, a federal judge concluded that the government had found “ample evidence” to link CAIR with Hamas. Additionally, Breitbart News has previously reported that several of CAIR’s board members, employees, and former employees “have been jailed or repatriated for various financial and terror-related offenses.”

Breitbart has also noted that CAIR presented itself as a “civil rights voice for American Muslims” and “was founded by members of the Palestine Committee (PALCOM), an organization ‘established to support Hamas.’” In addition to that, “Nihad Awad, currently CAIR’s executive director, was previously an official at PALCOM.” Awad has a long history of pro-HAMAS statements, according to critics. CAIR has posted its defense online.

In their article, which was tweeted out by CAIR, Newsweek reported that “The alt-right’s beef with McMaster stems from his firing of Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the NSC’s senior director for intelligence programs; Rich Higgins, the NSC’s director for strategic planning; and Derek Harvey, the NSC’s senior director for the Middle East.”

Higgins was fired on July 21 after he wrote a memo in May complaining that globalists and Islamists were obstructing Trump’s plans. Part of the memo, acquired by the Atlantic, argued that a “Maoist insurgency” had led “Islamists [to] ally with cultural Marxists” in order to undermine America.

The Atlantic noted that Higgins had also “pushed for declassification of documents having to do with radical Islam and Iran.”

Meanwhile, the Conservative Review presented the argument against McMaster, going so far as calling him a “land mine” in what they perceive as President Trump’s “self-immolation” and danger of becoming “a lame-duck president.” It stated:

Trump often complains about all the obstacles inhibiting his success — from the media and Democrats to establishment Republicans and “deep state” administrative officials shooting at him relentlessly.

But that is no excuse to self-immolate and step on a grenade, or worse, bring the shooters into his own home base to mow down the president’s most loyal supporters. McMaster is that land mine. It’s time to get rid of that obstacle or risk becoming a lame-duck president.

On Monday, the Center for Security Policy called for the firing of McMaster for “disloyal and subversive behavior,” and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) announced it was reviewing McMaster’s positions, actions, and statements on Israel.

source-spencer, robert-cair-ahmad, omar-hooper, ibrahim-nazarian, adelle, breitbart-newsweek-holy land foundation-palcom-palestine committee- awad, nihad-higgins, rich-harvey, derek-the atlantic-zoa-zionist org of america.

Muslim european takeover no prediction: it’s already happening–

34gh.,b7

These demographic and cultural/religious trends are ominous.
Is there a solution?

Only if the West destroys Islamic ideology while there is still time.

A   nationally   acclaimed   commentator  is alerting the world that the Muslim takeover of Europe is the “biggest story of our time” –

a  problem  he  says nobody knows about …a problem that stems from two major factors.
Mark Steyn points out that Europe is already in the death throes because  1)  the western half   of   the  continent  is  committing “demographic  suicide”  as  couples  are  no  longer  having  kids  and,   2)  the  thriving Muslim  population  in  Western Europe  is currently  well on its way to filling up all of the  empty space that longtime Europeans are leaving behind through diminishing birthrates.
He  said  that  a  foreboding  prophesy made by historian Arnold Toynbee is unfolding before our very eyes  –  that  “civilizations

die from suicide, not by murder.”

A now – not later – problem

The ominous forecast was further broken down.

“Given the divergent birth rate between Muslims and post-Christian secularists, it will take only two generations for the current Muslim population  (sitting at about 10-percent)  to  have  as  many  grandchildren as post-Christian secularists  (who currently make up the other 90 percent),”  LifeSiteNews’ Pete Baklinski noted from Steyn’s synopsis.   “This  is  due …  to  Muslims  having  on average 3.5 children per couple, compared to post-Christian secularists, who have only 1.3 children per couple.”

Steyn warned that the ever-increasing Islamization of Europe is already taking place, stressing how more and more elementary schools – such as one in Antwerp, Belgium – are already reporting that Muslims make up a majority of their student enrollment.

“People think this is a slow process, but it happens very fast,”  Steyn insisted,  according to LifeSiteNews.   “The catching up is well under way.   Nobody is predicting anything.   We’re talking about who are the kids in the grade school right now,  which means they are going to be the guys entering the workforce in 15 years’ time.”

He pointed to proof that can be seen by just sitting inside many classrooms across Europe today.

“That’s not a prediction – we’re not looking at trends,” the commentator continued.   “We’re looking at the actual warm bodies sitting in the elementary classes now.”

Steyn said that statistics derived from the Vienna Institute of Demography indicate that a majority of Austrians who are 15 years old and younger will be Muslim by 2050.

“This was a country that not so long ago was 90 percent Catholic,” he said.

Muslim european takeover no prediction: it’s already happening–34g.,b7

August 15, 2017

Muslim European takeover no

prediction: It’s already happening

Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com)
A   nationally   acclaimed   commentator  is alerting the world that the Muslim takeover of Europe is the “biggest story of our time” –

a  problem  he  says nobody knows about …a problem that stems from two major factors.
Mark Steyn points out that Europe is already in the death throes because  1)  the western half   of   the  continent  is  committing “demographic  suicide”  as  couples  are  no  longer  having  kids  and,   2)  the  thriving Muslim  population  in  Western Europe  is currently  well on its way to filling up all of the  empty space that longtime Europeans are leaving behind through diminishing birthrates.
He  said  that  a  foreboding  prophesy made by historian Arnold Toynbee is unfolding before our very eyes  –  that  “civilizations

die from suicide, not by murder.”

A now – not later – problem

The ominous forecast was further broken down.

“Given the divergent birth rate between Muslims and post-Christian secularists, it will take only two generations for the current Muslim population  (sitting at about 10-percent)  to  have  as  many  grandchildren as post-Christian secularists  (who currently make up the other 90 percent),”  LifeSiteNews’ Pete Baklinski noted from Steyn’s synopsis.   “This  is  due …  to  Muslims  having  on average 3.5 children per couple, compared to post-Christian secularists, who have only 1.3 children per couple.”

Steyn warned that the ever-increasing Islamization of Europe is already taking place, stressing how more and more elementary schools – such as one in Antwerp, Belgium – are already reporting that Muslims make up a majority of their student enrollment.

“People think this is a slow process, but it happens very fast,”  Steyn insisted,  according to LifeSiteNews.   “The catching up is well under way.   Nobody is predicting anything.   We’re talking about who are the kids in the grade school right now,  which means they are going to be the guys entering the workforce in 15 years’ time.”

He pointed to proof that can be seen by just sitting inside many classrooms across Europe today.

“That’s not a prediction – we’re not looking at trends,” the commentator continued.   “We’re looking at the actual warm bodies sitting in the elementary classes now.”

Steyn said that statistics derived from the Vienna Institute of Demography indicate that a majority of Austrians who are 15 years old and younger will be Muslim by 2050.

“This was a country that not so long ago was 90 percent Catholic,” he said.

The famous classic movie with starring Julie Andrews, The Sound of Music  –  that took the audience back to 1938 when an Austrian family was fleeing the Nazi German takeover  –  was brought up by Steyn,  who warned that in 2038,  Austrians will no longer be singing  “how do you solve a problem like Maria”  from the film but rather  “how do you solve a problem like Sharia?”

“This is the biggest story of our time, and yet hardly anyone ever writes about it,”  Steyn impressed.   “This is the biggest demographic movement/transformation in history, and it’s about to accelerate.”

Don’t let history repeat itself

The problems of Islamization and the demographic suicide currently taking place in the West was hinted at during President Donald Trump’s July 6 speech in Warsaw, Poland, where he reminded Poles that the culture and traditions of western civilization must be protected by sticking to pro-family values.

“Europeans must put faith and family – not government and bureaucracy – at the center of our lives,”  Trump declared in his speech, according to LifeSiteNews.

He did not want what happened in Poland under Hitler to happen in current times, as the freedom-reducing tide of Islam continues to spread throughout Europe.

Before attending Europe’s G-20 economic summit to represent the United States as one of the world leaders, Trump spoke before 15,000 Poles at the historic Krasinski Square in the nation’s capital  –  with a monument commemorating the World War II Warsaw Uprising of 1944 against Nazi Germany’s Adolf Hitler in the background.

“Poland  is  the  geographic  heart  of  Europe,  but more importantly  –  in the Polish people  –  we see the soul of Europe,”  Trump proclaimed, according to the New York Times.   “Your nation is great because your spirit is great and your spirit is strong.   Polish heroes  and  American  patriots  fought side by side in our War of Independence and in many wars that followed.   Our soldiers still serve together today in Afghanistan and Iraq, combating the enemies of all civilization.”

He celebrated patriots and culture-enduring heroes to urge the crowd to hold to their traditions and heritage.

“The signs of this friendship stand in our nation’s capital,” Trump continued.   “Just steps from the White House, we’ve raised

statues of men with names like Pulaski and Kosciuszko.   The same is true in Warsaw, where street signs carry the name of George Washington and a monument stands to one of the world’s greatest heroes, Ronald Reagan.”

As thousands began to chant  “Donald Trump!  Donald Trump!”  the president continued to urge them to not let liberty slip through their fingers as it almost did 80 years ago.

“Poland is a land of great heroes. You are the proud nation of Copernicus … Chopin, St. John Paul II,” Trump pressed forward.   “And so, I am here today not just to visit an old ally, but to hold it up as an example for others who seek freedom and who wish to summon the courage and the will to defend our civilization.”

Point of no return?

Steyn lamented that most Western European countries have already hit the point of no return and can no longer get their culture and centuries-old way of life back because they have abandoned their values and Christian heritage.

“A post-Christian Europe doesn’t really have any faith and it doesn’t have any families either,”  he asserted.   “They are fading into the past. They have essentially broken the compact of human societies.   The people who built the modern world are going out of business – voluntarily.”

This sentiment was also expressed by Tesla CEO and SpaceX Founder Elon Musk, who alerted the world via social media of the pending demographic crisis sweeping the globe.

“The world’s population is accelerating towards collapse,  but few seem to notice – or care,”  Musk posted on Twitter on July 21.

The successful entrepreneur also warned the business world during the last years of the Obama administration that the drastic population shift has major ramifications  –  and should not be taken lightly.

“The world should be concerned about demographic implosion,”  Musk told CNNMoney in September 2015, noting that the world is now experiencing an upside-down demographic pyramid with the elderly now representing a flat top that should be held up by a diminishing  younger  base.   “So,  if  you look at countries like Japan, most of Europe, China, and you look at the birth rates,  in a

lot of those places it is only at about half of the sustaining rate.   So … it will sort of fall over.   It will not stand.”

Population implosion … not explosion

Late last year, the scientific world was also warned about what the Earth’s demographics will look like in 2076, insisting that the “population bomb has imploded.”

“Go to Japan, where a recent survey found that people are giving up on sex,” NewScientist.com’s Fred Pearce wrote in November 2016.   “Despite a life expectancy of 85 and rising, the number of Japanese is falling  –  thanks to a fertility rate of just 1.4 children per woman, and a reported epidemic of virginity.   The population, it seems, are too busy  –  and too shy  –  to procreate.”

Besides the approximately 2 billion Muslims on the planet and some populous Third World nations, half of the world’s civilizations are dying out.

“It’s catching – half the world’s nations have fertility rates below the replacement level of just over two children per woman,”  Pearce pointed out.   “Countries across Europe and the Far East are teetering on a demographic cliff, with rates below 1.5.   On recent trends, Germany and Italy could see their populations halve within the next 60 years.”

Contrary to the population-control jargon spread by Planned Parenthood, Bill Gates and the environmentalist movement, it is argued that the world’s population will not continue to explode  –  making abortion and the “necessity” of having smaller families (having less children) the problem … not the solution.

“For now, the world’s population continues to rise,” Pearce concluded. “From today’s 7.4 billion people, we might reach 9 billion or so – mostly because of high fertility in Africa.   The U.N. predicts a continuing upward trend, with population reaching around 11.2 billion 

in  2100.   But  this  seems  unlikely.   After  hitting  the demographic doldrums, no country yet has seen its fertility recover.   Many demographers expect a global crash to be under way by 2076.”

Source: HAVERLUCK, MICHAEL- ONE NEWS NOW.COM- STEYN, MARK-TOYNBEE- BAKLINSKI, PETE-LIFESITENEWS-VIENNA INST. OF DEMOGRAPHY-NYT-MUSK, ELON- TESLA CEO-CNN MONEY-NEW SCIENTIST.COM-PEARCE, FRED-

Muslim brotherhood leader wants caliphate including Spain-

-34gh.,b7

As you probably already know, the goal of Islam is to rule the world, to be dominant, not to be dominated, to triumph over all other religions even though the non-Moslems resist. This world imperialist goal comes straight from the Islamic sacred texts of the Koran and Muhammad.
Here are a couple of examples:

As you probably already know, the goal of Islam is to rule the world, to be dominant, not to be dominated, to triumph over all other religions even though the non-Moslems resist. This world imperialist goal comes straight from the Islamic sacred texts of the Koran and Muhammad.
Here are a couple of examples:

Muslim brotherhood leader wants caliphate including Spain–34g.,b7

He it is who has sent his Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to make it victorious over all religion even though the infidels may resist. Koran 61:9

Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme. Koran 2:193

— Mohammed said, “I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshiped but Allah,

— Muhammad said: “Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, … ”

The Muslim Brotherhood’s credo is:
Allah is our goal; Muhammad is our leader; the Koran is our constitution; Jihad is our way; and dying for Allah is our highest hope.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s program for America, in their own words, is:

“The process of settlement is a ‘civilization-jihadist process’ with all the word means. The Muslim Brotherhood must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s (Allah’s) religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

The Muslim Brotherhood is the world’s leading Islamic movement, and it should be our first priority to outlaw it in America and combat it worldwide. Urge your legislators to support The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.

Muslim Brotherhood Leader Reaffirms “Islamic Caliphate” Ambition:

 

In an effort to invigorate the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the group’s leaders, Magdy Shalash, reminded supporters that the organization’s main objective is establishing an “Islamic Caliphate” based on “Sharia” law.

The Muslim Brotherhood was established for a general overall purpose, namely, the return of the comprehensive entity of the Umma (Muslim community)…the Islamic Caliphate, which is based on many Sharia proofs,” Shalash wrote in a Facebook post on Wednesday that was translated by the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT).

While many Islamist apologists attempt to defend the use of terms like “caliphate” or “jihad” as purely religious and peaceful concepts, Shalash does not try to hide the Brotherhood’s true colors.

He calls for “the return of all states Islam ruled, such as Andalusia and others, to the quarters of the coming Caliphate.” Andalusia is part of today’s Spain.

Islamist sympathizers who view the Brotherhood as a moderate force that only seeks to increase Islam’s role in political life fail to acknowledge the organization’s core mandate – to establish Sharia law and firm rule over all territories ever controlled by Islamic governance, no matter how long ago.

Shalash praised the “Ottoman Caliphate” since it “eliminated a state of pluralism and fragmentation in name of a plurality of Islamic countries…”

He wants internal Brotherhood elections to establish a unified leadership since “theorizing about something other than the overall goal (establishing the Caliphate)… puts the group in a state of fragmentation and division…”

Official Muslim Brotherhood statements in Arabic tend to reflect the group’s core motivations and goals more than sanitized statements in English.

The Brotherhood called for an “Islamic Intifada” – a violent uprising – against Israel July 14 following a deadly Palestinian terrorist attack in Jerusalem.

The statement reaffirmed the organization’s extremist and divisive worldview, labeling any Muslim a “traitor” if they fail to join the uprising against Israel: “The Muslim Brotherhood stresses that defending holy places, and blood and goods is a Sharia duty and a duty to every Muslim, which cannot be ignored except by a traitor or someone submissive.”

Palestinian terrorist organizations Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad followed the Brotherhood’s lead and called for Palestinians to “escalate the Quds Intifada” which fueled days of heightened tensions between Arabs and Jews in Jerusalem.

Pro-Palestinian Islamist organizations and Muslim Brotherhood affiliates in the United States organized anti-Israel protests throughout the country since the Temple Mount crisis unfolded, featuring vehemently anti-Semitic chants and radical statements.

“With life, with blood/we sacrifice for you Al Aqsa” and “the gate of Al Aqsa is of iron [Hadid], no one can open it but a martyr [Shahid].” These chants, translated by IPT, show how U.S. Islamist groups cultivate an atmosphere where terrorism and violence against Israel is openly encouraged.

source-ipt news-SHALASH, MAGDY-KORAN-TWRRORIST DESIGNATION ACT