joys of muslim women-


In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she cannot obtain a divorce. To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives ‘at will’ and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Sharia Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the Western World ( Canada, Australia, United States and Britain) Muslim men are starting to demand Sharia Law so the wife cannot obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American, Canadian, and British Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Sharia law.

By passing this on, enlightened Canadian, Australians, American and British women may avoid becoming a slave under Sharia Law.

Ripping the West in Two.  Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Sharia law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law – what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one’s children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics – one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims.

Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others..

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It’s hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petrol dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

(In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in Canada, Australia, the U.S. and Britain to elect the heads of Government by themselves! Rest assured they will do so… You can look at how they have almost taken over several towns in the USA .. Dearborn Mich. is one and there are others….Britain has several cities now with Sharia Law controlled zones, totally controlled by Muslims).

I think everyone in Canada, Australia, the U.S. and Great Britain should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!  It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity, to accept Muslims as peaceful.. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While Canada, Australia, the U.S.A. and Britain are getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on North America, Australia and Britain ….



A psychiatrist’s opinion of president Trump’s sanity-


Following President Trump’s Thursday announcement

that the USA would withdraw from the Paris accord, a

former CBS anchor (now with AXS TV) slammed the

President with a series of ad hominem  attacks, that

ended with strong suggestions that that the President

had some serious psychological issues.

Many others have made the same assertion.

What do psychiatrists think ?   In the paragraphs below,

Dr. Keith Abelow provides his opinions on this subject.

Remarks by Dr. Keith Abelow, Psychiatrist

Let me issue the standard disclaimer of psychiatrists

who discuss the mental health of public figures: I have

not personally examined President Trump.

Now, let me put to rest the concerns of Sen. Al Franken

and political commentators John Oliver and Andrew

Sullivan and anyone else who publicly or privately has

questioned the President’s sanity:  Donald Trump is

stone cold sane.

When a man acquires billions of dollars through

complex real estate transactions, invests in many

countries, goes on to phenomenal success in television

and turns his name into a worldwide brand, it is very

unlikely that he is mentally unstable.

When the same man obviously enjoys the love and

respect of his children and his wife, who seem to rely

on him for support and guidance, it is extraordinarily

unlikely that he is mentally unstable.

When the same man walks into the political arena

and deftly defeats 16 Republican opponents and

then the Democratic heir-apparent to a two-term

President’s administration, the odds of that man

being mentally unstable become vanishingly thin.

And when that very same man attracts to his team

the kind of intellect and gravitas represented (to

name just a few) by Secretary of Housing and Urban

Development Dr. Ben Carson, Attorney General Jeff

Sessions, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and

Secretary of Defense James Mattis, a retired Marine

Corps general and commander of the U.S. Central

Command, he cannot be mentally deranged. Period.

It is a statistical impossibility.

Those who assert otherwise are political opportunists,

or fools, or both (and I am thinking here, in particular,

of Sen. Franken).

President Trump is the first human being to win this

nation’s highest office without having held any other

political office or serving as a general. Most political

pundits thought his quest was pure folly.

Most journalists assessed his chances as zero. So

who was laboring under quasi-delusional thinking ?

If you’re still worried about the mental stability of the

President, note this: The stock market doesn’t like insta-

bility. Investors, en masse, can take the measure of a man

pretty darn well. The stock market has hit record high

after record high since Trump’s election, and if you think

that’s an accident, or that investors have all been fooled,

it’s time to start wondering about your own capacity for

rational thought.

I should note that nothing I am saying should besmirch

the reputations of men like President Abraham Lincoln

or Sir Winston Churchill, both of whom are said to have

fought the ravages of major depression or bipolar

disorder. One was instrumental in ridding America of

slavery. The other was instrumental in saving the world

from tyranny.

Mahatma Gandhi, by the way, also reportedly suffered

from depression.  Psychiatric illness does not, a priori,

disqualify a person from rendering extraordinary service

to mankind.

Mind you, neither Lincoln nor Churchill nor Gandhi led a

nation after becoming a business sensation and television

star. That trifecta defines one man :  President  Donald  J.


Now, think about those who are rabble-rousing about the

President’s mental status.

Take Sen. Al Franken.  He’s all worried about the President

allegedly overestimating the crowd size at his inauguration.

But Franken is allied with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who

asserted she is Native American, when there is no evidence

of that whatsoever.

And they’re calling Trump’s sanity into question ?   Really,

you can’t make up this stuff.

source-dr, keith abelow,

From the new American magazine

–6/19/17—39H., B71

Americans growing more liberal, Gallup survey finds:

Americans are becoming mo liberal in their moral values, according to the polling of a little over 1000 adults across the USA, the views Americans hold on a core of moral issues.  91% of those surveyed consider birth control to be morally acceptable; 73% think divorce is okay, compared to 59% of respondents in 2001, 69% were in favor of sex between an unmarried man and women versus 53% in 2001; 63% of approved of same-sex relationships versus 40% in 2001, and 62% approved of having a child outside of wedlock versus 45% in 2001.

Attitudes appear to be more or less the same as they  were in 2001: 43% approve of abortion on demand in American today compared to 42% 16 years ago.  On a positive note Gallup found 49% disapprove of abortion.

A 2016 survey by the southern Baptist  Convention Lifeway  Research showed that 81% of Americans are concerned about declining moral behavior in their country.  A total of 46% of respondents said that they strongly agree with the statement “I am concerned about declining moral behavior in our nation”. with only 6% saying they strongly disagree and another 13% saying they disagree.

Illegal-alien arrest up nearly 40% under Trump—

Statistics released by immigration and customs enforcement (ICCE) on 5/17 indicated that during the 100 days since Trump signed multiple executive orders regarding immigration enforcement priorities, ICE agents have arrested more than 541,000 individuals who are either known or suspected of being in the country illegally.  This represents an increase of 37.6% over the same period in 2016.

75% of those arrested during this period in 2017 are convicted criminals. The arrest of aliens at-large in the community increased but more than 50% from 8381 last year to 12.766 arrests this year during the same period.  the arrest of convicted criminals aliens climbed nearly 20% from 25,786 last year to 30,473 this year.

1/25 Trump signed and executive order to begin construction of a wall on the US border and to improve immigration enforcement .  Ending the catch and release policy practiced by Obama.  ICE agents arrest illegal’s whose only crime is entering the country illegally.

Harvard study confirms media bias against Trump.

Trump was the topic of more than 405 of all news stories during his first 100 days )3 times the amount of press coverage received by previous presidents.  The main sources of the bias comes form:  NYT, CNN, WSJ, Washington Post, CBS, NBC, Fox, The financial times, BBC, ARD.

Negative news reports outpaced positive ones by 80% to 20% .  In one week did the coverage drop below 70% negative and it reached 90% negative at its peak.  CNN and NBC was the most unrelenting. by 13-1 on the tow networks.  Trumps coverage on CBS also exceeded 90% marker.  80% level in the NYT, 87% negative, and Washington Post 83% negative.  The WSJ came in below that level at 70% negative.

MSM’s was unfavorable in every dimension.  Trumps immigration policies generated negative to positive rations that exceeded 30 to 1.  healthcare reform and Russia alleged involvement were 87% negative, while MSM coverage of Trumps appointees and his personal background, his foreign policy and national defense positions were at least 80% negative.













Trump wants republicans to repeal obamacare immediately if senate bill fails–


President Donald Trump stunned the political world Friday by suggesting in a tweet that if Senate Republicans fail to muster enough support to pass the Obamacare replacement bill, they should instead just repeal the disastrous health care law altogether.

“If Republican Senators are unable to pass what they are working on now, they should immediately REPEAL, and then REPLACE at a later date!” he wrote, drawing cheers from those among the right who have been clamoring for a total repeal since day one.

The president’s tweet was reportedly prompted by a letter sent to him earlier that morning by Nebraska Republican Sen. Ben Sasse, who urged him to “hold all Republicans accountable to our promise to repeal ObamaCare.

“Therefore, on July 10, if we don’t have agreement on a combined repeal and replace plan, we should immediately vote again on H.R. 3762, the December 2015 ObamaCare repeal legislation that the Congress passed but President Obama vetoed,” he wrote.

As Sasse noted, that bill had already passed in the House only to be vetoed by then-President Barack Obama. The House could pass the same bill again. The Senate could pass the same bill again, and Republicans in both houses would be hard-pressed to explain to their voters why they couldn’t support the same measure they supported six months ago.

A new president would have the power to sign it this time. And he sounds more than willing to.

As noted by The Wall Street Journal, the president’s sudden announcement places him at odds with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has been adamant in his belief that his widely panned replacement bill is the GOP’s best path forward.

Yet a vote on McConnell’s bill has already been delayed once due to the large number of Republican senators who oppose it. Nor has the bill found much love among conservative intellectuals, who have been quick to point out that it maintains much of what made Obamacare such a disastrous law in the first place.

“The bill retains Obamacare’s core regulatory scheme,” warned Ben Shapiro for The Daily Wire, adding that it not only still forces insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions, but it “re-enshrines subsidies to insurance companies.”

“The bill is actually so weak that even Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber is chortling that it doesn’t actually repeal Obamacare. That’s because it doesn’t.”

Correct. Gruber, the MIT economist Gruber who is considered to be the principal architect behind Obamacare, even praised some aspects of Senate bill last month, admitting that it’s “no longer an Obamacare repeal bill” but just a flimsy replacement.

There’s a reason some refer to the reform bill as “Obamacare-Lite.” And there’s also a reason why so many conservatives argue that ditching it in favor of a full-fledged repeal bill, as the president suggested Friday, would better serve the American people’s interests, regardless of what McConnell thinks.

Are Republicans forgetting why they got elected?

source–v saxena, conservative tribune, wsj, ben shapiro, gruber, the daily caller

Let’s all move to HawaiI–welfare recipients


Can’t you hear students telling their teachers they want to be welfare recipients when they grow up?

The work ethic we inherited growing up has fallen prey to the ‘welfare’ system.

The Cato Institute released an updated 2014 study (original study in 1955) showing that welfare benefits pay more than a minimum wage job in 33 states and the District of Columbia

Even worse, welfare pays more than $15 per hour in 13 states.  Accordingly, it’s now more profitable to sit at home and watch TV than it is to earn an honest day’s pay.  Hawaii is the biggest offender, where welfare recipients earn $29.13 per hour, or a $60,590 yearly salary, all for doing nothing.  Here is the list of the states where the pre-tax equivalent “salary” that welfare recipients receive is higher than having a job:

As a point of reference the average Middle Class annual income today is $50,000, down from $54,000 at the beginning of the Great Recession. Hawaii, DC, and Massachusetts pay more in welfare than the average working folks earn there.  Is it any wonder that they stay home rather than look for a job?

Note that California is $18.50 an hour.

Salary of retired United States Presidents: $180,000 FOR LIFE

Salary of House/Senate: $174,000 FOR LIFE
This is beyond stupid.

Salary of Speaker of the House: $223,500 FOR LIFE — (This is really stupid.)

Salary of Majority/Minority Leader: $193,400 FOR LIFE — Ditto last line.

Average Salary of a teacher: $40,065
Average Salary of a U.S. Soldier deployed in Afghanistan:  $38,000.
Now think about this:

Nancy Pelosi will retire as a Congress Person at $174,000 Dollars a year for LIFE.  She has retired as SPEAKER at $223,500 a year. PLUS she will receive an additional $193,400 a year as Minority Leader, the fact that she has become rich while in office notwithstanding.  That’s $803,700 Dollars a year for LIFE including FREE medical care which is not available to us …. the taxpayers.  She is just one of the hundreds of Senators and Congress that float in and out every year.

Hawaii : $60,590
2. District of Columbia :$50,820
3. Massachusetts : $50,540
4. Connecticut : $44,370
5. New York : $43,700
6. New Jersey : $43,450
7. Rhode Island : $43,330
8. Vermont : $42,350
9. New Hampshire : $39,750
10. Maryland : $38,160
11. California : $37,160
12. Oregon : $34,300
13. Wyoming : $32,620

  1. Nevada : $29,820
    15. Minnesota : $29,350
    16. Delaware : $29,220
    17. Washington : $28,840
    18. North Dakota : $28,830
    19. Pennsylvania : $28,670
    20. New Mexico : $27,900
    21. Montana : $26,930
    22. South Dakota : $26,610
    23. Kansas : $26,490
    24. Michigan : $26,430
    25. Alaska : $26,400
    26. Ohio : $26,200
    27. North Carolina : $25,760
    28. West Virginia : $24,900
    29. Alabama : $23,310
    30. Indiana : $22,900
    31. Missouri : $22,800
    32. Oklahoma : $22,480
    33. Louisiana : $22,250
    34. South Carolina : $21,910



Pelosi gives another muddled speech, confusing details and mispronouncing words–


Another strange speech by Nancy Pelosi caught the media’s attention Thursday, as the Minority Leader took the podium for her weekly press conference. Into a hot mic, she seemed to remind herself what time of day it was. “It’s afternoon. It is afternoon. Good afternoon everyone,” she began. Then, removed from her reminder by seconds, she said, “Thank you for being here. I’m honored this morning, or now afternoon…”

It went downhill from there.

Pelosi referred to a Democratic ranking member as the “chairman” before correcting herself, then denounced Republican attempts to replace Obamacare. “And what does that mean? Higher costs, fewer benefits, uh, terrible age tax undermining Medicare, uh, uh, stealing from Medicare and Medicaid, as I should have said,” she rambled, mispronouncing Medicaid.

Moving on to Russia, she continued to stutter and stumble over words and details, stating and then quickly forgetting how many states were allegedly affected.

Pelosi has made other mistakes and confusing statements recently, and as the Democrats continue to lose elections, her continued leadership is reportedly in question.

source–dennis michael lynch, kat hepherd

Abedin emails show Clinton donors receiving special treatment-


Our understanding of the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s State Department continues to expand as more of her illicit server’s emails are revealed.
This week we released 448 pages of documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing new incidents of Huma Abedin, deputy chief of staff to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, providing special State Department treatment to major donors to the Clinton Foundation and political campaigns.

The heavily redacted documents from Abedin’s non-government account include an email from Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, to Abedin revealing that he acted as a go between for a Clinton Foundation donor, Richard Park. And they reveal Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band instructing Abedin to “show love” to Clinton donor Andrew Liveris.

The documents included six Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to at least 439 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department, and further contradicting a statement by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails had been turned over to the State Department.

A number of emails show the free flow of information and requests for favors between Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

In July 2009, in reference to the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, Clinton Global Initiative head Doug Band told Abedin that she “Need[s] to show love” to Andrew Liveris, the CEO of Dow Chemical. Band also asked for Liveris to be introduced to Hillary, “and have her mention both me and wjc”.  Dow gave between  $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative.  Band also pushes for Clinton to do a favor for Karlheinz Koegel, a major Clinton Foundation contributor, who wanted Hillary Clinton to give the “honor speech” for his media prize to “Merkel.”

The emails reveal that on June 19, 2009, Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, passed a long a letter for Hillary Clinton for Clinton donor Richard Park.  Park donated $100,000 to Bill Clinton as far back as 1993 and is listed by the Clinton Foundation as a $100,000 to $250,000 donor.

The Washington Examiner reported:

In March 2012, Bill Clinton received an invitation to speak at the Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea…. Richard Park’s friendship with Tony Rodham earned him a direct line to Hillary Clinton while she served as secretary of state. In January 2013, the Korean businessman sent Rodham an email and asked him to “forward this to your sister.”

On November 14, 2009, Clinton donor Ben Ringel, who has appeared in numerous prior emails asking for favors, emailed Abedin to get help in getting an Iranian woman a visa to come to the United States. He writes: “We need to get her clearance even only temporary to be with her granddaughter.” Abedin forwarded the request to Lauren Jiloty, asking her “Can U help Monday with consular affairs?” Jiloty replies, “Sure. Will look into it.”  Ringel donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.  In May, Band, working through Abedin, attempts to help Canadian concert promoter and Foundation donor Michael Cohl with the processing of a visa. Abedin passes the request to Monica Hanley, Clinton’s “confidential assistant.”

The emails show that the Clinton Foundation operative Band was involved in personnel matters at the Clinton State Department.  In a May 2009 email exchange between Band and Abedin, a “career post” to East Timor for someone is discussed. Abedin explains to Band that Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton’s then-chief of staff, was working on the situation “under the radar.”

In August 2009, Band tells Abedin of someone who wants to be the ambassador to Barbados. Abedin replies: “I know, he’s emailed a few times. But she wants to give to someone else.”

The emails also show that Abedin received advice from her mother, Saleha Abedin (a controversial Islamist activist), on whom the Obama administration should appoint as the US Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.   She notes that she has obtained a recommendation from “Hassan” (NFI), and that she’d reached out to “Ishanoglu”. This is presumably Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, a Turkish academic and the former Secretary-General of the OIC. Ihsanoglu famously called on the West to enact anti-Islamic blasphemy laws.

On Monday, June 8, Clinton emails her aide Lona Valmoro and Abedin asking to attend a cabinet meeting: “I heard on the radio that there is a Cabinet mtg this am. Is there? Can I go? If not, who are you sending?” Valmoro answers: “It is actually not a full cabinet meeting today – those agencies that received recovery money were invited to attend/participate. We were welcome to send a representative though, not sure if we have anyone going.”

Other emails found in Abedin’s unsecure email account appear to show additional instances of the Clinton State Department’s lax approach to protecting national security.

On July 4, 2009, U.S. Ambassador to Kenya Jonathan “Scott” Gration sent Abedin an email that the State Department has classified in part and redacted because the information deals with “foreign governments” and “national defense or foreign policy.” Abedin forwarded Gration’s email to her personal, unsecure email account.  In his email, Gration related his meeting with Libyan president Muammar Qadafi, saying: “I conveyed our appreciation for Libya’s role to improve relations between Chad and Sudan … Leader al-Qadafi promised to continue his nation’s close collaboration with the United States … and is eager to meet you and President Obama.…” Gration would later be fired for, among other things, using personal email accounts to send government information.

A document titled “HRC PRIVATE LINE BLOCK” gives the planned whereabouts for President Obama for Thursday, June 4, 2009: “Attend POTUS Foreign Policy Speech at Cairo University.” In another example of lax concern for security, Valmoro forwarded Clinton’s detailed daily schedule for July 15, 2009, to officers of the Clinton Foundation, including Doug Band and Justin Cooper. Again, on July 26 Valmoro forwarded Hillary’s detailed, sensitive daily schedule to numerous Clinton Foundation officials.

In other examples of lax concern for security, on June 11, there is a reference to testing the “Federal preparedness and response for an international terrorist threat to the United States. [Principal-Level Exercise] will be a scenario-driven discussion for Cabinet Secretaries, agency Directors and Administrators, senior officials in the Executive Office of the President, or their approved representatives.” A document in Abedin’s unsecure email account dated May 2009 is titled “The Secretary’s Phone Call with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang” is marked sensitive but unclassified and fully redacted, as is a document titled “The Secretary’s Phone Call with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.”

I’m not sure how much more evidence of pay for play, classified information mishandling, and influence peddling from Clinton’s email server one would need to show for a serious criminal investigation is required.
sourec–judical watch, richard park, andrew liveris, karlheinz koega, wash ezaminer, lauren jiloty, ben ringel, michael cohl, monica hanley, saleha abedin, ekmeleddin ihsanogula, lona valmoro, oic, jonathan scott gration,