Muslim Official DESTROYS Obama With 1 Sentence For Visiting Controversial Mosque–1gh., b3a
Barack Obama is slated to make the first visit of his presidency to a U.S. mosque on Wednesday, but the one he has chosen is stirring controversy, due to its former leader’s links to Muslim extremism, including the belief that suicide bombings can be justified. The once imam of the Islamic Society of Baltimore, Mohamad Adam El-Sheikh, not only has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, but to a northern Virginia mosque where radical Anwar al-Awlaki used to preach.
Al-Awlaki was an American who joined al Qaeda and released several propaganda recruiting videos for the terrorist organization. He also became a top al Qaeda operative, who was reportedly killed by an American drone strike in Yemen in 2011. “As a Muslim American I’m just insulted, this is disgraceful that this is one of the mosques — or the mosque — that he’s chosen to visit,” Zuhdi Jasser, of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, told Fox News on Sunday. “This mosque is very concerning.”
While in Baltimore, El-Sheikh also served as regional director of the Islamic American Relief Agency, whose parent organization has been cited by the Treasury Department for connections to al Qaeda and the Taliban. The imam later became head of the Dar Al Hijrah Center in Falls Church in Northern Virginia. Al-Awaki gave fiery messages in that same mosque only months before El-Sheikh’s arrival in 2003.
The Washington Post reported that El-Sheikh stated that same year that Islamic law allows for suicide bombings in some instances, “if certain Muslims are to be cornered where they cannot defend themselves, except through these kinds of means, and their local religious leaders issued fatwas to permit that, then it becomes acceptable as an exceptional rule, but should not be taken as a principle.”
“Dar Al-Hijrah, which is located right outside Washington, D.C., is connected to several high-profile Islamic terrorists who prayed there, including Major Nidal Hassan – the Ft. Hood massacre jihadi, two September 11 hijackers, and an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,” Breitbart reported.
“The president believes that one of our nation’s greatest strengths is our rich diversity,” he stated. “As the president has said, Muslim Americans are our friends, and neighbors; our co-workers, and sports heroes — and our men and women in uniform defending our country.”
The mosque, according to Obama, has “an All-American story.” The question is: which story is the President telling?
A story of all religions being equal? “Think of your own church or synagogue or temple,” he said on Wednesday, “And mosques like this will be very familiar. This is where families come to worship and express their love for God and for each other.”
But this particular mosque hasn’t been just a place of worship. It’s been the petri dish for radical Islamist thought.
For fifteen years, the mosque was served by former imam and member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan, Mohamad Adam El-Sheikh.
During his time at the mosque in Baltimore, he served as regional director from the Islamic American Relief Agency – the international parent organization of which has been cited by the U.S. Treasury Department for connections to Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
FBI reports and eyewitness accounts have made it clear that a large number of the mosques in the United States urge their congregations to wage jihad against the infidels (us) and impose Sharia Law first on all Muslims and then on all Americans.
This is sedition, not religion.
Sharia Law is not only barbaric – justifying murder, the oppression of women, and the annihilation of other religions – but it’s also incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. One cannot be a strict adherent of Sharia Law and still swear an oath to our Constitution. Yet, we allow Sharia to be advanced on a daily basis in hundreds of mosques across America.
Three major studies in the last 10 years have all found the same results. Over 75% of the 2,000 mosques in America are “radicalized.” And what does radicalized mean? That of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and only 19% had no violent texts at all.That in 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts.That mosques which are Sharia adherent were more likely to feature.
Freedom of religion does not include the right to openly preach the destruction of the U.S. Constitution or violent jihad. Mosques that preach godliness and tolerance must be protected; but those that preach hatred and violence must be revealed for what they are – threats to our national security.
So why do I tell you about these centers of hatred in our midst?
source-western jouranalism, randy desoto, david horowitz