70% of American Jews vote as Democrats.

“The most charitable way of explaining the election results of 2012 is that Americans voted for the status quo – for the Incumbent President and for a divided Congress. They must enjoy gridlock, partisanship, incompetence, economic
Stagnation and avoidance of responsibility. And fewer people voted.
Romney lost because the conservative virtues -the traditional American virtues – of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and Aspirations to moral greatness no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate. The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff. Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such A powerful marketing tool.

Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment. the difficulty of winning an election in which “47% of the people” start off against him because they pay no taxes and just receive money – “free stuff” – from the government.
Almost half of the population has no skin in the game – they don’t care about high taxes, promoting business, or creating jobs, nor do they care that the money for
their free stuff is being borrowed from their children and from the Chinese.
They just want the free stuff that comes their way at someone else’s expense. People do vote their pocketbooks. In essence, the people vote for a Congress who will not raise their taxes, and for a President who will give them free stuff, never mind who has
to pay for it.
That the electorate is ignorant and uninformed. The clear majority – are unintelligent and easily Swayed by emotion and raw populism. That is the indelicate way of saying that too many people vote with their hearts and not their heads. That is why Obama did not have to Produce a second term agenda, or even defend his first-term record.
Obama could get away with saying that “Romney wants the rich to play by a different set of rules” – without ever defining what those different rules were; with saying that the “rich should pay their fair share” – without ever defining what a “fair share” is; with saying that Romney wants the poor, elderly and sick to “fend for themselves” – without even acknowledging that all these government programs are going bankrupt. Obama (or his surrogates) could hint to blacks that a Romney victory would lead them back into chains and proclaim to women that their abortions and birth control would be taken away. He could appeal to
Hispanics that Romney would have them all arrested and shipped to
Mexico and unabashedly state that he will not enforce the current
immigration laws. He could espouse the furtherance of the
incestuous relationship between governments and unions – in which politicians ply the unions with public money, in exchange for which the unions provide the politicians with votes. Obama also knows that the electorate has changed
– that whites will soon be a minority in America(they’re already a minority in California) and that the new immigrants to the US are primarily from the Third World and do not share the traditional American values that attracted immigrants in the 19th and 20th centuries. Obama also proved again that negative advertising works, invective sells, and harsh personal attacks succeed. That Romney never engaged in such diatribes points to his essential goodness as a person; his “negative ads” were simple facts, never personal abuse – facts about high unemployment, lower take-home pay, a loss of American power and prestige abroad, a lack of leadership, etc.
Obama mastered the politics of envy – of class warfare – never reaching out to Americans as such but to individual groups, and cobbling together a winning majority from these minority groups. For Jews, mostly assimilated anyway and staunch Democrats, the results demonstrate again that liberalism is their
Torah. Almost 70% voted for a president widely perceived by Israelis and most committed Jews as hostile to Israel . They voted to secure Obama’s future at America ‘s expense and at Israel ‘s expense – in effect, preferring Obama to Netanyahu by a wide margin. A dangerous time is ahead. Under present circumstances, it is inconceivable that the US will take any aggressive action against
Iran and will more likely thwart any Israeli initiative.
The takers outnumber the givers, and that will only increase in years to come. The “Occupy” riots across this country in the last two years were mere dress
rehearsals for what lies ahead – years of unrest sparked by the increasing discontent of the unsuccessful who want to seize the fruits and the bounty of the successful, and do not appreciate the slow pace of redistribution.
If this election proves one thing, it is that the Old America is gone. And, sad for the world, it is not coming back.”

The problems we face today are there because the people who
work for a Living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.

sources—rabbi pruzansky, the Israel national news


Mosques exempt from gov’t surveillance

Report: Mosques exempt from gov’t surveillance (37J)
Chad Groening ( Friday, June 14, 2013
A pro-Israel advocate says no one should be surprised by a recent report that radical mosques are now exempt from monitoring by the FBI.
According to an online editorial in Investor’s Business Daily, mosques have been off-limits to the FBI for almost two years. Since October 2011, says that report, surveillance or undercover sting operations in mosques have been prohibited without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the “Sensitive Operations Review Committee.”The panel was reportedly set up because of complaints from Muslim groups about sting operations conducted by the FBI, which were very effective in disrupting dozens of Islamic terror plots against the homeland – and just months after the ACLU and the Council on American-Islamic Relations sued the FBI, asserting that infiltration and monitoring of Los Angeles mosques violated the civil rights of Muslims in that area.
The op-ed says no one knows the makeup of the Sensitive Operations Review Committee because the names of its members and staff are kept secret.
Cardoza-MooreOneNewsNow contacted Laurie Cardoza-Moore, president of Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, about the IBD editorial. She says the Obama administration is always standing with Muslims.”Remember, [President] Obama said that when the winds change and the world turns against Islam, he is going to stand with the Muslims. He’s been very clear [about that],” she comments. “And the Muslims aren’t his political enemies – it’s Christians, it’s ‘Zionists,’ it’s tea party activists. Because we know the truth.”Cardoza-Moore says one only has to look at where Obama is investing American tax dollars. “He’s not investing them in building democracies around the world. He’s investing our tax dollars in building Muslim Brotherhood Islamic governments,” she notes.
A recent report also revealed the Obama administration may send weapons to the rebels in Syria, many of whom are tied to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
– See more at:


(1H) 6/22/13

In his speech 5/23 at the National defense U. Obama reassured Americans that they are “safer” because of the administration’s efforts to fight terrorism. Even months after Benghazi and Boston, Libya he states “now make no mistakes our nations is still threatened by terrorist”. From Boston to Benghazi we have been tragically reminded of that truths” (BUT YOU SAID WE WERE SAFER?). “We have to recognize that the threat has shifted and evolved from the one that came to our shores on 9/11”. “This is the moment to ask ourselves hard questions—about the nature of today’s threats and how we should confront them”. Ripping two lines our of context from Bin Laden “we could lost the reserves to enemy’s air strikes. We cannot fight air strikes with explosives”, the full message does not actually support the presidents point. Laden speaks as if he represents the entire Muslim community, the Ummah, which he did not, the Ummab he should put forward some, but enough, forces to fight America. The Ummah must keep some of its forces on reserves. The Ummah will use the reserve in the future but during the appropriate time.
In the rest of the 27 pages document undermines the president’s case. “We still have a powerful force which we can organize and prepare for deployment” bin Laden wrote. This cuts against the president claim that al Qaeda is mostly a spent force. Laden emphasized that al Qaeda needs to “concentrate its jihad efforts in areas where the conditions are ideal for us to fight. Iraq and Afghanistan are tow good examples. The president cited just one of the 17 bin Laden documents declassified and released to the American public.
The president seeks to define the threat form al Q and it affiliates in such a way that there is no longer any need for American to deploy large numbers of troops abroad. The president then offered four examples intended to illustrate his point. In all four cases—in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Mali—others lead the fight on the ground. It is clear he wants limited US involvement. His solution is we must define the nature and scope of this struggle or else it will define us”. We must have a strategy based “not on fear, but on hard earned wisdom”. It all begins with understanding the current threat that we face.
Al Q and if affiliates do not think the war has ended, they are fighting in more countries than ever.
AL QAEDA IS ALIVE: they maintain safe havens in Kunar and Nuristan Provinces and operates elsewhere. The Taliban remains closely allied with Al Q and associated groups. International security assistance force shows that the level of violence remains higher that before the obama orders surge of American forces in 2010. The Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan or Pakistan Taliban remains a threat after orchestrating the failed may 2010 bombing in Times Square. The TTP has a “symbiotic relationship with al Q. Iran and al Q maintains a “core pipeline for transiting fighters, money and weapons to Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.
According to the UN April 2013 was the deadliest month in Iraq in nearly 5 years that is since before Obama was even elected. (Good job). AQI increased its operational capacity form 75 attacks per week across Iraq by the end of the year. AQI’s ranks have swelled. The group has established new training camps new sage havens and a whole new arm in Syria—the Al Nusrah Front. They are pulling in recruits form throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
In Arabia, al-Q has aggressively expanded the scope of its operation since early 209 when the Saudi and Yemen branches of the terrorist network merged to form ALQ in the Arabian Pennisual (AQAP). The group has attempted other attack against the US homeland since then. By 2011 AQAP has seized much of southern Yemen only to relinquish territory as US-backed Yemeni government force expelled al Q operatives form their strongholds. Somalia, Shabaab continues to wage an insurgency against African forces and has executed attacks inside neighboring Kenya and Uganda, Shabaab formally merged with al Q in 2/2012. In Mali Islamic Maghreb made such stunning advances that France was forced to intervene. Elsewhere in Africa and the Middle East al-Q lined groups continue to operate and expand.
The president often argues that the “tide of war is receding”. If al Q affiliates, or allied groups are not directly plotting mass casualty attacks on American soil toady, then they are not a major threat to the US and it interests. What is remarkable about this logic is that the threats to the US homeland have multiplied since Obama assumed office. AQAP, the Pakistani Taliban and the al-Q leaders inside Iran have all had a hand in targeting the US since 2009. Vigilances and Lady luck have cooperated to spare the American lives.
The counterterrorism and intelligences community that al Q “core” is a distinct enterprise from the terror networks affiliates. Overall leader now is Ayman Al Zawahiri. From Obama’s perspective, geographic proximity seems to be the characteristic that matters most when defining the core. The raid in Abbotabad and drone strikes elsewhere the threat form al Q has dissipated. Obama concedes, “We’ve seen they are “lethal, but he is reassured because they are “less capable” than the crew that attack a decade ago. For Obama the future of terrorism consists primarily of threats to diplomatic facilities and businesses abroad, as well as homegrown extremists. He sees the possibility of another -/11 style attack as remote.
Core al Q in the Arabian Peninsula, in Iraq, the Islamic Maghreb, shabaab in Somalia have sworn an oath of loyalty (bayah). It means that these groups are committed to following Zawahiri’s orders and pursuing al Q strategic vision, which goes far beyond attacking America. Evidence that al Q senior leadership communicates with and sets the agenda for the affiliates. Al Q senior leaders also rely upon loyal followers who will advance the organizations cause even absent day-to-day guidance. Consider just some of the terrorist who runs al Q operations outside the Afghanistan and Pakistan, Yemen the Arabian Peninsula is led by Nasir al Wuhayshi.
According to obama adm. The terrorist who leads al Q network inside Iran toady is a Kuwaitit named Mushsin al Fadhli.
A defense department report “al Q in Libya: a profile, published by the Library of congress in August 2012 identified at least two senior operatives who were dispatched to Libya ot oversee al Q efforts there. One is know as Abu Anas al Libi. The second terrorist identified in the report is Abdl al Baset Azzouz who was sent to Libya by Zawahiri. Jehad Mostafa who is believed to by Zawahiris’s emissary to Shabaab, al Q affiliates in Somalia. .
Bin Ladens recommended that a terrorist named Mohanned Islamboli leave northern Pakistan for Kunar, Afghanistans. Mohammeds brother Khaled Islanbouli was the assassin who killed Egyptian president Sadat. Islanbouli is the equivalent of royalty in jihadist circles and is today a free man inside Egypt.
Some of the men who can be counted onto advance al q agenda outside Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The war in Afghanistan will come to and end, even al Q holds onto territory and its allies vie for supremacy in th country. In no theater of was except homeland security does Obama think that America should lead the way. They president simply chooses not to see that each of the conflicts is parts of cohesive international challenge to the USA and its allies. Bin Laden document cited by Obama during his speech at the National defense Univ. also contains the following passage:
“Praise be to God the jihad war is ongoing and on several fronts. The Muhahidin work and may God give them the strength to endure on the jihad path will continue to target the guardian of universal apostates, America, until it becomes a weak. Once America is weak, we can build our Muslim state”


If I were to tell you that since 5/4/13 thru 6/3/13 that there has been over 247 terrorist attacks in the world and over 1175 people killed would you believe me—probably not but just take a minute and look at these and then check it out for yourself.
These were shootings, bombings, stabbings etc. The countries that these happened in are Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Niger, Iraq, Libya, Thailand, Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, Kenya, Egypt, Paris, Dagestan, Somalia, Nigeria, India, Saudi Arabia, UK, Iran, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Philippines, Mali.

Iraq, Iran and Pakistan lead the way in both murders and attacks

still feel save


If I were to tell you that since 5/4/13 thru 6/3/13 that there has been over 247 terrorist attacks in the world and over 1175 people killed would you believe me—probably not but just take a minute and look at these and then check it out for yourself.
These were shootings, bombings, stabbings etc. The countries that these happened in are Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Niger, Iraq, Libya, Thailand, Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, Kenya, Egypt, Paris, Dagestan, Somalia, Nigeria, India, Saudi Arabia, UK, Iran, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Philippines, Mali.

Iraq, Iran and Pakistan lead the way in both murders and attacks



The NSA has been holding secret closed meetings (on the recordings)—wonder what they are talking about?
Shouldn’t the taxpayer know what they are discussing and what info they have? Are they listening to conservations or just getting phone numbers—ANY BETS.
Trumka in now in favor of the immigration bill, how these people will grow the economy, he failed to mention growing his union ranks. Just a few weeks ago he was against the bill.
Los Angeles now is trying out a new incentive plan for their high schools, for perfect attendance you can earn a car, I pads, just for showing up for classes—didn’t mention any grade requirements. And also there is no mention that if they do not show up they get welfare taking away—doesn’t that seem only fair to the taxpayer?

Magdi Ahmad Hussein of Egypt is an Islamic labor leader who stated he was very fond of battles with the enemies of china—-like Israel and America. We have given them $1.3 billion this year and over $10 billion total. Are we trying to buy our friends who hate us?

The IRS all of the sudden is canceling orders for new spy equipment. Obamacare will have a 18% tax increase. Who should be tracking the health care records, right now its going to be the IRS has a role in 47 provisions in the bill. It already weighs 24# and hasn’t been read completely yet. The IRS will determine if you have adequate coverage on health care. 55% of Americans still oppose Obamacare. 76% say the IRS should not be the ones to enforce health care.
A fox polls shows 82% of Americans feels the economy is still bad.
Verizon is running a special cable to the government direct. They had received over 10,000 face book request in 2012 . Pentagon IS buying military components from china for night vision glasses and rocket propellant. DON’T YOU THINK THAT’S A GREAT IDEA???

Source fox news



LET THE SUNSHINE IN—5/23 Obama declared an end to the global war on terror. “The threat posed by Al-Qaeda, it’s affiliates and those it inspires can be managed”, he said.
The president described an al Qaeda so thoroughly enervated that the threat it poses no longer requires a sustained global campaign dedicated to its elimination. “Today the core of the Al-Qaed in Afghanistan and Pakistan is on a path to defeat”. “Their remaining operatives spend more time thinking about their own safety than plotting against us”.
There are many reason to think he’s wrong and some of the most compelling are being kept from the American public. They come form al-Qaeda itself, in the documents captured during “Neptune Spear”, the operation on 5/2/11 that resulted in the death of bin Laden. The seals brought out with them numerous bags full of valuable intelligence from the compound in Abbottabad. Six days after the raid, the white house top national security adviser Tom Donilon. Said the collection could fill a small college library. It’s been two years since that material was captured. To date the obama adm. has made public just 17 documents available. There has been nothing since.
Bruce Riedel a veteran of the CIA and adviser on AFG said, “the US government could safety release far more to help the public and experts better judge the threat al-Qaeda and its allies still pose. The handful of documents release last year painted a picture of al-Qaeda consistent with the president’s election-year narrative.

A report from West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center accompanied the documents was “letters form Abbottabad: Bin Laden sidelined?” Repeatedly made clear that they were offering only a glimpse of al-Qaeda and Laden based on a small sample of document selected by the government.
US officials briefed on the full cache of documents say that bin Laden played an active role in coordinating attacks and running al Qaeda central. The documents how that al Qaeda leader as someone who wanted the organization he built to continue to reflect his priorities and objectives and who sought to make clear to those beneath him what those were. More than 400 “immediate-threats reports” were generated during the initial stage one exploration of the Abbottabad documents according to James Clapper that bin Laden played a key role in maintaining strong relations be between Al Qaeda central the Taliban and its leader Mullah Omar.
Bruce Riedel, the former Obama adviser told the Hindustan Times that the documents demonstrated that al Qaeda leader played a significant role in planning the attacks in Mumbai in 2008. “The documents and files found in Abbottabad showed a close connection between bin Laden and Saeed, right up to May 2011.” “the documents suggested a much larger direct al Q role in the planning of the Mumbai attacks than many assumed”.
Some show a pragmatic bin Laden laying out the benefits of a partnership of convenience with the mullahs. Senior Iranian officials cultivated the relationship with al Q and provided significant help on logistics, training and transit through Iran. Documents also provide additional information about the very close relationship between al Q and Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI. The overlap between al Q and the ISI has been known for years.
The CIA became territorial, reluctant to share what it controlled. After several months of squabbling between the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency and CENTCOM, a team of more than two-dozen analysts from the military side finally gained access. The 17 documents only helped the white house shape the public narrative.
But member of congress have had little access to the documents themselves and most of the briefing about their contents have taken place at the staff level. Who will decide what the members see? Brennan?
“At a minimum, says rep. Nunes. Members of the house and senate Intelligence committees should have access to the full documents in their entirety as soon as possible. And every document that can be declassified should be made available to the public immediately

sources—weekly standard, Washington post, Hindustan times, steven hayes.



The Obama administration is heralding a conference later this month in Geneva where representatives of Bashar al Assad regime will ostensibly sit down with the Syrian rebel forces opposing them. The last thing they want is a intra-Syrain peace process with the ruling clique that slaughtered peaceful demonstrators for a year before the opposition finally picked up arms in its own defense what the rebels what is weapons and the grounding of Assad’s air force with a no-fly zone.
Lebanese militia has fully entered the Syrian civil war on the side of Assad. Holding Quasayr is critical to preserving a land link form that is to Hezbollah-controlled regions of Lebanon.
Reports suggest that Hezbollah may be on the verge of retaking the town form the rebels, but it’s come at considerable cost and thanks in no small part to the Syrian regimes air and artillery support.
April was the 30th anniversary of Hezbollah bombing the US embassy in Beirut and October will mark the 30th anniversary of the bombing of the Marine barracks in which a Hezbollah suicide bomber killed 241 Americans.
For four decades US officials refused to stand up to Hezbollah and chose to look the other way when the terrorist group targeted Americans.
It was because American officials did not want to challenge Hezbollah that they welcomed the analysis of Middle East experts who told them Hezbollah was nothing to worry about anyway. But Hezbollah never stopped its terrorist attacks.
In fact the administration should welcome Hezbollah’s deployment of forces as an opportunity to break it’s back. Hezbollah is unlikely to continue to absorb as many causalities as it did in Qusayr last week.

Source—weekly standard, lee smith